Home News Room Op-Eds
Op-Eds
7/1/2011: Harvard International Review - Protecting Religious Freedom Abroad PDF Print E-mail

July 1, 2011 | by Leonard A. Leo and Elizabeth H. Prodromou

 

The following article appeared in the Harvard International Review.  To access this article, go to http://hir.harvard.edu/protecting-religious-freedom-abroad 

 

For much of the world, there is no greater human right than the freedom to practice one’s religion or belief system according to the dictates of conscience, without fear of coercion or retaliation.

 

Yet, across much of the globe, religious freedom and related human rights are egregiously and routinely violated.   The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) reports on countries that it deems serious or severe violators -- based on criteria laid down by the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) which created the Commission -- and provides independent policy recommendations for US government action.  

 

When most people picture violations of religious freedom, they imagine governments either preventing people from worshipping or otherwise abusing them for their beliefs.   They may think of China, the world’s most populous country, where disfavored religious groups, from Tibetan Buddhists to Uighur Muslims, and from the Protestant house church movement to the Falun Gong, are ruthlessly suppressed.   They may picture Iran, where a theocratic regime still provides for the execution of all individuals, regardless of faith or confession, who are convicted of the charge of “waging war against God”-- thus targeting reformers among the Shi’a majority, as well as members of religious minorities, including Sunni and Sufi Muslims, Baha’is, and Christians, while stirring up anti-Semitism by promoting Holocaust denial.

Read more...
 
8/26/2011: The Hill - Religious freedom for Turkey? PDF Print E-mail

August 26, 2011 | by Elizabeth H. Prodromou and Nina Shea  

 

The following article appeared in The Hill on August 26, 2011.  To access the original article, go to http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/foreign-policy/178317-religious-freedom-for-turkey

 

The recent resignation of Turkey’s military high command, along with reports that Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan will subordinate the military to civilian rule, could mark a new era for that nation.  Sweeping constitutional changes, however, are still needed to ensure fundamental rights and avoid exchanging one form of repression for another.  The United States should challenge Turkey’s civilian leadership to make such long-overdue changes, especially regarding religious freedom, including for religious minorities.

Tags:
Read more...
 
6/22/11: The Hill - A voice for Iran’s freedom PDF Print E-mail

June 22, 2011 | by Don Argue and Ted Van Der Meid  

 

The following article appeared in The Hill on June 22, 2011.  For a link to the original article, go to http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/foreign-policy/167905-a-voice-for-irans-freedom

 

The week of June 20 marks the second anniversary of the murder of Neda Agha-Soltan, a 26-year-old Iranian who was slain during demonstrations in Tehran against her country’s fraudulent June 12, 2009 presidential election.

Tags:
Read more...
 
5/13/11: The Hill - After bin Laden: The religious freedom imperative PDF Print E-mail

May 13, 2011 | by Leonard A. Leo and Dr. Don Argue

 

The following article was published in The Hill on 5/13/11.  For the original article, go to http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/foreign-policy/161073-after-bin-laden-the-religious-freedom-imperative

 

The violent death of Osama bin Laden ends the life of a terrorist who had blazed a terrifying trail of murder and other atrocities.  His notorious life provides a cautionary tale. It highlights not only what can happen when nations let down their security guard, but when they ignore the worst violations of a fundamental human right – the right to freedom of religion or belief.

Read more...
 
8/03/11: Roll Call - Leo and Gaer: Combat Violent Extremism in Pakistan by Protecting Religious Freedom PDF Print E-mail

 


ROLL CALL        Opinion

Special to Roll Call
Aug. 2, 2011, 4:05 p.m.

In its global struggle against violent religious extremism and terror, the United States has had an increasingly strained relationship with Pakistan, which has failed to counter these forces effectively, especially in recent years.

Last month, the U.S. responded by suspending $800 million of its military aid to Pakistan's capital of Islamabad. It's time for the administration to take other steps, beginning with designating Pakistan a "country of particular concern" under U.S. law for severe violations of religious freedom.

For America, Pakistan's failure means a tougher job stabilizing neighboring Afghanistan and a greater instability in South Asia.

For Pakistan, it means no one is safe. Violent religious extremists are able to target their foes with impunity, including Pakistani officials such as Punjab Governor Salman Taseer, a Muslim, and Minister of Minority Affairs Shahbaz Bhatti, a Christian, both of whom were assassinated earlier this year for demanding reforms to Pakistan's blasphemy law.

For Pakistan's people, it means their nation has a security problem and also a serious human rights deficit, both of which call for solutions which bolster religious freedom.

The Taseer and Bhatti assassinations underscore Pakistan's failure to protect the right to freedom of thought, conscience or religion for even its most prominent citizens. In recent years, armed radicals have escalated attacks against Sufi and Shi'a Muslims and especially against religious minorities, including Ahmadis and Christians.

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, on which we serve, has reported on a long chain of religiously related murders and violence dating back to 2001.

On Sept. 10, bombers attacked a Shi'a procession in Lahore, killing at least 40 and wounding as many as 200. Two days later, bombers attacked a similar procession in Quetta, murdering at least 70 and wounding 160. Scores of Ahmadis were gunned down in May 2010 in Lahore during Friday prayers. In July of that year, 40 Sufis were slain and hundreds wounded in the bombing of a shrine, also in Lahore. In 2009, violence in the village of Gojra was unleashed against Christians, killing eight and injuring 18, and two churches and 75 homes were set on fire.

Not only does Pakistan typically fail to prevent or successfully prosecute such crimes, it fuels them through its harmful laws, including mandates that criminalize Ahmadis' practice of their religion and a blasphemy law that commonly is used to intimidate religious minorities or others with whom the accusers disagree or have unrelated conflicts.

These measures embolden religious extremists, fostering a climate conducive to vigilantism and other violence against unpopular religious minorities, women and even members of Pakistan's religious majority.
According to interviews our commission conducted during the past several months, more Muslims are charged under the blasphemy law than members of any other religious group in Pakistan, but religious minorities are targeted disproportionately.

Pakistan's educational system further fuels the problem. Our review of public-school textbooks and other materials has found intolerant references against religious minorities, particularly Hindus, Christians and non-Sunni forms of Islam. Fifth-grade-level textbooks have accused Hindus of dishonest dealings with Muslims. In addition, some of Pakistan's thousands of religious schools include texts with an interpretation of Islam that promotes religious extremism and provides ideological training to those involved in religiously motivated violence, both in Pakistan and abroad.

In response to this continued failure to protect freedom of religion or belief, the commission has strongly recommended the State Department officially designate Pakistan a "country of particular concern," one of the world's worst religious freedom violators and human-rights abusers.

Such a designation, which the commission has sought since 2002, would help the United States press Islamabad to undertake needed reforms. The United States also should urge Pakistan to reaffirm and reinforce the rule of law, aligning its laws with international human-rights standards; prosecute vigorously those committing violence against religious minorities; and release unconditionally those who are in jail for blasphemy while placing a moratorium on this law's use until it is reformed or repealed.

As a human-rights concern with serious security implications, the need for greater respect for religious freedom and related rights should be an integral issue in the U.S. bilateral relationship with Pakistan.
We have identified this as a problem, and the United States should be devising and demanding solutions. While it is complicated and awkward to do so in the case of an ally, the abuses and threats posed by a growing religious extremism threaten both countries.

Designating Pakistan a "country of particular concern" will help the United States turn its efforts to new solutions and practices to address Pakistan's endemic religious freedom problems.

Leonard A. Leo is chairman of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom. Felice D. Gaer serves as a commissioner with the organization.

 
3/18/2011: Christian-Muslim Tension in Egypt: Religious Freedom Must Prevail - Washington Post PDF Print E-mail
Tags:
Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 5